EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
Challenging national court decisions in the administrative law domain is a core area of our expertise. This body of case law forms the foundation for a wide range of international human rights matters, including extradition, refusal of entry, denial of residence permits, and unlawful judicial proceedings. The jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights informs the practice of INTERPOL, constitutes the legal basis of extradition and expulsion proceedings, and serves as a fundamental standard for judicial processes more broadly, particularly in extradition cases. Accordingly, litigation before the Strasbourg Court is not only our primary area of specialisation, but also a core professional competence.
We represent clients in cases involving extradition proceedings, entry refusals, asylum applications denials, and expulsions, ensuring that domestic decisions are challenged both at the national and international level. Our practice includes urgent applications for interim measures before the ECtHR, which often constitute the only effective tool to stop unlawful surrender or removal. We are experienced in the procedure of balancing competing interests, with particular focus on family-related cases, as well as in invoking the absolute prohibition of torture and ill-treatment in matters concerning extradition and politically motivated or unlawful criminal prosecution.
We represent clients in cases involving extradition proceedings, entry refusals, asylum applications denials, and expulsions, ensuring that domestic decisions are challenged both at the national and international level. Our practice includes urgent applications for interim measures before the ECtHR, which often constitute the only effective tool to stop unlawful surrender or removal. We are experienced in the procedure of balancing competing interests, with particular focus on family-related cases, as well as in invoking the absolute prohibition of torture and ill-treatment in matters concerning extradition and politically motivated or unlawful criminal prosecution.
1
HUMAN RIGHTS LITIGATION
LEGAL SERVICES
INTERNATIONAL SUSPENSION OF EXTRADITION
Extradition is a dangerous procedure, which in some cases may be carried out without a proper examination of the underlying criminal file. Courts often authorise extradition without fully considering the risks that the requested person could face upon surrender. At times, recourse to international human rights mechanisms is the only effective way to influence the national judicial system, ensuring that a case is examined in depth and decided with proper regard to human rights law.
Exercising international human rights mechanisms, both intergovernmental and non-governmental, may form part of a broader defence strategy or operate as a stand-alone safeguard where no effective domestic protection exists. This includes engagement with institutions and organisations such as the United Nations Working Group on Arbitrary Detention, Human Rights Watch, Amnesty International, Fair Trials, OMCT, and other relevant human rights bodies. When combined with a properly tailored national defence strategy, these mechanisms can create substantial legal and practical pressure.
In some cases, work with international institutions becomes the only genuine last resort, particularly where extradition or surrender is imminent. In urgent cases, international protection tools may be decisive. The European Court of Human Rights, the Committee Against Torture, and the Human Rights Committee all have the power to indicate interim measures capable of effectively suspending extradition or transfer. An interim measure issued by the ECtHR is legally binding on all Member States of the Council of Europe.
Exercising international human rights mechanisms, both intergovernmental and non-governmental, may form part of a broader defence strategy or operate as a stand-alone safeguard where no effective domestic protection exists. This includes engagement with institutions and organisations such as the United Nations Working Group on Arbitrary Detention, Human Rights Watch, Amnesty International, Fair Trials, OMCT, and other relevant human rights bodies. When combined with a properly tailored national defence strategy, these mechanisms can create substantial legal and practical pressure.
In some cases, work with international institutions becomes the only genuine last resort, particularly where extradition or surrender is imminent. In urgent cases, international protection tools may be decisive. The European Court of Human Rights, the Committee Against Torture, and the Human Rights Committee all have the power to indicate interim measures capable of effectively suspending extradition or transfer. An interim measure issued by the ECtHR is legally binding on all Member States of the Council of Europe.
2
INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS BODIES BARRING EXTRADITION
INTERPOL
NOTICE CHALLENGE
International Criminal Police Organization plays a crucial role in facilitating international cooperation among law enforcement agencies. However, being listed in INTERPOL’s databases can significantly affect a person’s daily life, leading to:
Aida Litigation (LLC) has an expertise to delete records in the INTERPOL Database different natures:
INTERPOL Red Notice Removal
INTERPOL Blue Notice Deletion
INTERPOL Yellow Notice Blocking and Revise
INTERPOL Green Notice Challenge
An INTERPOL lawyer must have outstanding expertise, as the Commission for the Control of INTERPOL’s Files (CCF) applies a strict framework for processing applications and does not provide an opportunity to re-examine the same case or appeal its decision before any other body. This means that the CCF considers each request only once, making it essential that the application be prepared with the highest level of professionalism. A revision of a CCF decision is possible only in the event of the emergence of new facts, which is also allowed but requires a very careful approach in determining whether genuinely new circumstances exist during the CCF Revision.
If there is not yet any data in INTERPOL’s repositories, it is possible to prevent the publication of a notice by submitting a preventive request to INTERPOL, which is formally acknowledged by the General Secretariat as an INTERPOL pre-emptive request.
- Refusal of residence permits or naturalisation
- Rejection of visa applications
- Restrictions on banking, business registration, licensing, accreditation, and partnership opportunities
- Risk of arrest while travelling
- Exposure to extradition proceedings
Aida Litigation (LLC) has an expertise to delete records in the INTERPOL Database different natures:
INTERPOL Red Notice Removal
INTERPOL Blue Notice Deletion
INTERPOL Yellow Notice Blocking and Revise
INTERPOL Green Notice Challenge
An INTERPOL lawyer must have outstanding expertise, as the Commission for the Control of INTERPOL’s Files (CCF) applies a strict framework for processing applications and does not provide an opportunity to re-examine the same case or appeal its decision before any other body. This means that the CCF considers each request only once, making it essential that the application be prepared with the highest level of professionalism. A revision of a CCF decision is possible only in the event of the emergence of new facts, which is also allowed but requires a very careful approach in determining whether genuinely new circumstances exist during the CCF Revision.
If there is not yet any data in INTERPOL’s repositories, it is possible to prevent the publication of a notice by submitting a preventive request to INTERPOL, which is formally acknowledged by the General Secretariat as an INTERPOL pre-emptive request.
3
CCF REQUEST FOR INTERPOL NOTICE DELETION
AIDA LITIGATION
Our law firm provides comprehensive legal support in the field of international human rights law, focusing on the interface between the individual and the State. Our core expertise lies in the most complex areas of international law, including extradition, INTERPOL matters, expulsion, political asylum, and the challenge of unlawful or abusive international alerts and notices. We possess extensive expertise in professional communication with INTERPOL, EUROPOL, and key international human rights bodies, including the European Court of Human Rights, the UN Human Rights Committee, and the UN Committee against Torture. We have expertise in preventing extradition or expulsion in cases that risk violating fundamental rights, are politically motivated, or stem from unlawful prosecution. We also challenge national court decisions before international human rights bodies, seeking to bar the execution of expulsion or extradition rulings and to contest unlawful criminal proceedings at the international level.
Our main office is located in Georgia, where we provide legal services in the administrative field with a particular focus on human rights protection. We handle cases involving violations of rights during criminal proceedings, as well as immigration matters pursued both before administrative bodies and in court. Our areas of work include:
Our main office is located in Georgia, where we provide legal services in the administrative field with a particular focus on human rights protection. We handle cases involving violations of rights during criminal proceedings, as well as immigration matters pursued both before administrative bodies and in court. Our areas of work include:
4
ABOUT
Unlawful criminal prosecution, including illegal international search requests or the risk of an INTERPOL notices.
Persecution on political grounds or on account of membership of a particular social group.
Extradition in cases involving a real risk of human rights violations or where the request is politically motivated.
Unfounded refusal of asylum or expulsion resulting from an inadequate examination of the case
LEGAL EXPERTISE. LEGAL EXPERTISE. LEGAL EXPERTISE. LEGAL EXPERTISE. LEGAL EXPERTISE. LEGAL EXPERTISE. LEGAL EXPERTISE. LEGAL EXPERTISE. LEGAL EXPERTISE. LEGAL EXPERTISE. LEGAL EXPERTISE.
LEGAL EXPERTISE. LEGAL EXPERTISE. LEGAL EXPERTISE. LEGAL EXPERTISE. LEGAL EXPERTISE. LEGAL EXPERTISE. LEGAL EXPERTISE. LEGAL EXPERTISE. LEGAL EXPERTISE. LEGAL EXPERTISE. LEGAL EXPERTISE.
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience